Saturday, October 25, 2008

Cross Talent


Models decide to become chanteuses on the way to the first ladyship of France. Actors decide that they are clearly cut out for political roles, and politicians appear in Saturday Night Live skits.

Despite the reputation of being a little “out there,” most writers don’t fancy themselves musicians, nor do artists often delude themselves that they will easily master the steps, fluidity, and muscle strength necessary for ballet. (Zelda Fitzgerald is an exception, and she was, clinically speaking, “out there.”) Most people, however, who are firmly dedicated to one form of artistic expression appreciate other forms, and may dabble. Although I’ve been writing since I was six, I enjoy drawing and playing the piano. Recognition that I am a poor drawer and pianist in no way diminishes my enjoyment of these activities.

My recently inspired foray into acrylic painting has led me to three insights. The first is that, realistically, I will never be a proficient painter. I lack the underlying drawing ability, its technique and its vision, which is a necessary basis for painting. I lack the training and mentorship, and it is unlikely that I’ll chose paths that will lead to immersion in the world of painting.

The second insight is that this foray allows me to appreciate on new levels precisely what painting entails, and a better sense of what I’m seeing when I look at others’ paintings. I see what goes right, because I now know first-hand how easy it is for things to go wrong in translating ideas and visions into form, color, line and texture.

The third insight is into myself. For inexplicable reasons, the act of painting fills me with joy. As a fairly perfectionistic person, I’m accustomed to dispatching into the world thoughts and ideas, written or verbal, which state exactly what I intend. I have the linguistic tools available to create poems, letters, emails, agendas, or dissertations to express precisely what I intend to express. With painting, that just isn’t going to happen! My reaction is not one of frustration, but of intense freedom. I can simply PAINT, reveling in the colors, the smells, and the motion of my hand as it makes a curve. Paintings now exist in the world that did not exist before I created them. Opinions in my house imply that the world would be just fine without these paintings, but I disagree; their creation brings me joy; their existence brings me delight. It’s a win-win situation.

Have you, as an artist, made forays into other areas of the art world, and what were your experiences?

Friday, October 24, 2008

Why write? Why paint?


These deceptively simple one-syllable words together are potent. They bear the enormously important question that has obsessed most artists at some point in their lives. When Rembrant and Picasso painted self-portraits, they were attempting to capture the figurative (and literal) artists’ eye. Modernist meta-poets like Eliot, Pound and Stevens likewise sought to explore the complex and intermingled relationship between art and reality as the creator’s mind touches upon what is perceived through the senses.

Does art depict and capture reality? Or does art create that reality?

Perhaps art and writing allow us to explore reality, to run it through individual and temperamental filters, and to choose what words, lines or colors will be used to create something visible to others and to ourselves. In this case, art provides one perspective, one version of reality. This in turn influences those who see or read it with open minds, whose own realities are influenced.

Creating art, be it painting, photography or poetry, also contains the sheer joy of creation, a celebration of the human ability to communicate nuanced emotions and ideas. Wallace Stevens explores the joy of language, and its necessity in a world which can be vulgar, banal, and menacing:


The Plot against the Giant

First Girl
When this yokel comes maundering,
Whetting his hacker,
I shall run before him,
Diffusing the civilest odors
Out of geraniums and unsmelled flowers.
It will check him.

Second Girl
I shall run before him,
Arching cloths besprinkled with colors
As small as fish-eggs.
The threads
Will abash him.

Third Girl

Oh, la...le pauvre!
I shall run before him,
With a curious puffing.
He will bend his ear then.
I shall whisper
Heavenly labials in a world of gutturals.
It will undo him.
"Harmonium," 1923

Blog Virgin


I've been a reader of blogs, as a way to get into the minds of others who I will never meet because of distance, chance, and full-to-brimming lives. As a "ghost reader" I've been privy to thoughts, hopes, visions and opinions of many creative people. Occasionally, I have commented under the cover of "anonymous." Anonymous (along with "appropriate;" that's another story) is a word that I dislike. I share thoughts and opinions with a few, but when I do am proud to claim them mine. Thus, it is time for me to establish a blog identity.

This blog will be concerned with the synergy, connection, and sometimes conflict between creativity and reality. Poets, including but not at all limited to, Leonard Cohen, Wallace Stevens, e.e. cummings, Yeats and Plath will be starting-points. Insight from all are welcome, "heavenly labials in a world of gutturals" are the tools writers and artists use to speak, to communicate with, and to explore the myriad, complex, startling, and fascinating human mind.

I'll end this with a section from Wallace Steven's "The Man with the Blue Guitar."



The man bent over his guitar,
A shearsman of sorts. The day was green.

They said, "You have a blue guitar,
You do not play things as they are."

The man replied, "Things as they are
Are changed upon the blue guitar."

And they said then, "But play, you must,
A tune beyond us, yet ourselves,

A tune upon the blue guitar
Of things exacly as they are."